Tag Archives: telephone

do not call

OK, here is something interesting to think about. ( for me at least. )

I have only one phone number, my mobile phone, and it’s been listed in the Do Not Call Registry for a while.  I just verified it. Register yours.

Your phone number with the last four digits XXXX was registered in the National Do Not Call Registry on 6/30/2003. Most telemarketers will be required to stop calling you 31 days from your registration date. Your registration will (or did) expire on 7/1/2008.
 
Visit http://www.donotcall.gov/ to do any of these things:
-- to renew your registration before it expires
-- to file a complaint

Now in the last 3 months I have gotten more unsolicited telemarketer calls to my phone than ever.  I’ve filed complaints on the registry website, with the information asked about the annoyance, and of course my full information.  Now if only the government would put some action behind these complaints.  I thought companies have to use this list of numbers their not supposed to call in their campaigns?  Or are they just using them for numbers to call, like I figured would happen when they created this free list of telephone numbers.  It seems like the later.

I think that if your listed in the do not call list, then every solicitation, profitable, non-profitable, some asshole running for office, or telling you about some lame ass reason to not use your own brain and vote a certain way, should be illegal.  But of course the schmucks who run things decided to add themselves a nice loophole, and of course made it open to their religious counterparts to bug us for donations.

Back from the tangent, the call I recieved that set this off, from a snail mail spammer, was for a domain I chose not to renew this year.  From all the domains I own, I get crap in the actual mail pretty often, for “renewing my domain”, well, by their definition of “renewing”, it moves to their services.  Basically their trying to steal the domain registration from another provider, by making the layman think that they are simply renewing their domain.

If I have to pay for every bit of traffic that my phone consumes, be it text, or voice, I should be able to choose whom is allowed to contact me.  I hate I recieve someone’s mis-text and then I get charged 10 cents.  Why should my carrier care?  They are making money hand over fist by not allowing these privacy restrictions.  AT&T Wireless before they were bought were nicer about this, and let me have free incoming text, so it didn’t bother me.  And I don’t use my voice plan enough as it is, and I’m on the lowest paid plan, still paying too much for what I really use though.

[tags]donotcall, telephone, telemarketing, do_not_call_list,annoyances,rant, personal, technology [/tags]

EFF protects phone-in prescriptions from illegal wiretap

Ok, well that’s really only half of it. I think most of us like the government doing it’s best to fight crime and the likes, but not at the destruction of US citizens Fourth Amendment rights. Find a better way to do it. The government currently uses a device called a pen/trap to collect numbers dialed from a telephone, suppose this device captures your voicemail passcode, or SS# with other information when filling a prescription, or even information you have entered into a telephone chat service. Does the government really need to know that their intelligence mark, refills his erectile disfunction medication frequently and is also looking to chat with an 18 F from 90210? Sure if they were trying to entrap him/her.

The EFF filed a brief recently, which argued that in order for the government to collect any content of a telephone call, including the numbers dialed on a phone keypad, it must first have a warrant. I honestly cannot imagine the vast array of information big brother has gathered illegally, from telephone and internet pen/traps.

[via]

More on pen/traps here.

The Limits of SpongeBob SquarePants

One Canadian’s Wireless Neighborhood Network Could Someday Serve Us All

By Robert X. Cringely

Like many of us, Andrew Greig put a WiFi access point in his house so he could share his broadband Internet connection. But like hardly any of us, Andrew uses his WiFi network for Internet, television, and telephone. He cancelled his telephone line and cable TV service. Then his neighbors dropped-by, saw what Andrew had done, and they cancelled their telephone and cable TV services, too, many of them without having a wired broadband connection of their own. They get their service from Andrew, who added an inline amplifier and put a better antenna in his attic. Now most of Andrew’s neighborhood is watching digital TV with full PVR capability, making unmetered VoIP telephone calls, and downloading data at prodigious rates thanks to shared bandwidth. Is this the future of home communications and entertainment? It could be, five years from now, if Andrew Greig has anything to say about it.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040930.html

Bad Behavior has blocked 631 access attempts in the last 7 days.

>>>>>>> .r246