Tag Archives: proprietary

Exclusionary and Discriminatory Tactics of the Cox Cable Company

I spent another 1.5 hours this morning on the phone with Cox after the guy who came to “fix” my [tag]cable card[/tag] left. After the first time I got off the phone today I really wish I had the ability to record the conversation.

When I ordered services had they specifically told me which channels I would not be able to receive, I would have been more friendly of a customer to deal with. My number one complaint about Cox Customer Support, Technical Support, and Sales, is the complete lack of education they receive for the products they offer. It really equates to false advertising in that they offer X HD channels, of which you have to pay an extra added premium for use of their proprietary hardware and technology.

Their basic explanation today about why I do not receive certain HD channels is as follows; The channels are being broadcast using digital video switching and the cable card technology does not work with it. That’s fine. Why are you using that technology for those 8 channels while the other 300 waste “valuable bandwidth”? They chose to make these 8 specifically not work with the cable card technology they offer for HD programming they retransmit. The cable company is severely guilty of not reallocating their limited bandwidth appropriately. The cable industry is also guilty of developing antiquated technology to blame their shortcomings on, eg cable card.Why of course the cable company decides to discriminate against users of consumer electronics such as the [tag]TiVo[/tag] has everything to do with lock-in and profits with their hardware.

Let’s take a look at the hardware offered by most cable companies. The prices I’m using are Cox’s for example. The cable card only costs $1.99/month plus $44.95 installation.( I managed to get them to waive this absurd charge after the fact.) Finally their DVR costs $12 or more plus install, and a regular digital box $5-7 not including installation fee. So I did manage to get the Billing Supervisor to give me a one-time coutesy credit of $39 and change for the difference in rental cost of a cable card and cable box over a year. He refused to provide the difference in cable card and DVR, which would have been more substantial and gratifying. Another partial win for me nonetheless.

I like the TiVo. I consider mine an investment in my TV watching habits as there was an upfront cost for the device and monthly service. I hate commercials, TiVo lets me skip easily. Comcast even started using TiVo software for their customers, albeit on a digital cable box platform. I’m sure they get to watch for example CNN HD, Food Network HD, and History HD and record it all just fine. Cox just wants to force it’s customers into renting their expensive and useless hardware. For any standard definition channel the cable card is able to receive it should also be able to receive the high definition version as well at no extra cost.

With the transition to Digital Television approaching quickly many of the kinks are still in the system. The more kinks in Cox’s system the more profitable they are with their fees and expanded service tiers. Maybe they would be more profitable if they just made something that worked and the customers came to them because of the quality of service not because they are the only game in town. I can only hope someone finds this post and it helps them with their service provider.

opensource idea/knockoff im sure..

How many towns/cities/counties are in the United States?
And if each of the above had, atleast;
1 full-time paid open source programmer..
1 full-time Q/A, know it all, goto guy/girl, to learn how things function, and how to improve
X sysadmins, depending upon need.

And all of them worked together/distributed, to create fully functional environments that replace their current crappy proprietary software, that all our cities/towns/counties use, by implementing open source projects, directions for improvement upon these projects, and giving back their work for the good of the project/people.

I’m sure most of the small places just need a CMS website, email, and some data driven forms/workflow.

I think you’d have an awesome situation.

I hope Los Angeles can follow through with their plan to use open source software for their needs, and I hope they employ programmers, and others who aren’t just there for a paycheck, but are there, because they realize open source is good for the soul.

Patents Patents everywhere. Humble patent officers without temptations…

The EU, just made a stop against their patent system from starting. Why should we let ours continue?

from techworld:

Torvalds joins in anti-patent attack

Lax US rules not helping anyone.

By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service

 

Linus Torvalds has joined the chorus of voices speaking out against software patents.

“Software patents are clearly a problem, and I think it’s a problem that the open source community has been pretty aware of for the last five years,” said Torvalds. “The good news is that a lot of proprietary vendors are starting to see it as a problem as well.”

He was referring to announcements by IBM and Sun last month that they will make thousands of software patents available to open source developers. IBM made 500 of its patents available to the open source community, saying it would promote innovation. Sun followed suit two weeks later, releasing more than 1,600 patents of its own.

More companies are expected to follow, but nevertheless, patents remain a major source of concern, according to a panel of open source luminaries who discussed the issue at the OSDL Enterprise Linux Summit in California.

There are an estimated 150,000 to 300,000 registered software patents in the US alone, and many open source developers would like to see them invalidated. They believe that many such patents are frivolous and that copyright law is a better mechanism for protecting software innovations.

Part of the problem is that the US Patent Office has been lax in granting patents, said Mitchell Kapor, a founder of Lotus Development and a prominent backer of the Mozilla browser. “There have been tens of thousands of bad software patents issued which never would have been issued if the Patent Office had actually been following its own rules,” he said.

Ultimately, these bad patents may come back to haunt the open source community, Kapor predicted, saying that Microsoft will eventually be driven to launching wide-ranging patent lawsuits, which he called “patent WMDs” against open-source projects. “Their business model no longer holds up in an era where it’s clear that open source is simply an economically superior way to produce software,” he said. “Of course they’re going go unleash the WMDs. Why would they not?”

Torvalds was reluctant to make predictions though. “I’m the anti-visionary. I distrust people with visions,” he said. “You don’t see what’s right in front of your face and you don’t see the technical issues that face everyday users.”

Bad Behavior has blocked 1519 access attempts in the last 7 days.

>>>>>>> .r246