Tag Archives: programming

you know this rox

blah

1 minute

Have you noticed how major broadcasters are running TV programs a minute early or late just to mess up your recording of the program? Now they advertise their programs to be start at a certain time, and end at a certain time. Is it legal for them to advertise the show starting and ending at a certain time, just to run the program a few minutes late/early?

Isn’t this false advertising? We pay for the content, and they are providing inaccurate information about their programming schedule.

I read the other day about one of the East coast states, forcing the movie theaters to properly inform when the movie actualy starts and not just when they start running the trailers and ads. Similar?

Is it really fair to Us that they are trying to make extra on their advertising fee’s by telling us inaccurately when our favorite show starts, or the movie we paid to see begins?

### from the AP

Networks try to foil TiVo with tiny schedule shifts

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Television networks are lending new meaning to time-shifting: TV shows don’t necessarily start or end right on the hour or half-hour anymore, screwing up some viewers’ video recordings.

More programs are running an extra minute or two longer to keep viewers from switching channels. Shows recently padded include CBS’s “Without a Trace,” Fox’s “Renovate My Family,” ABC’s “The Bachelor” and NBC’s “ER,” according to Nielsen Media Research.

The tactic has been used on and off for a few years but has grown more popular as competition in network television stiffens.

As a result of the overruns, people who use VCRs and digital video recorders like TiVos end up clipping the beginning or ending of a show. For some, the time conflict could also prevent a later show from being recorded.

TiVo Inc. officials say they have fielded a small number of complaints about the network time-shifting. This season, the company began advising its 2 million subscribers to watch out for such time conflicts and to adjust their recording settings manually.

-May Wong, AP Technology Writer.

An Elder Challenges Outsourcing’s Orthodoxy

Sure, Mr. Samuelson writes, the mainstream economists acknowledge that some people will gain and others will suffer in the short term, but they quickly add that “the gains of the American winners are big enough to more than compensate for the losers.”

That assumption, so widely shared by economists, is “only an innuendo,” Mr. Samuelson writes. “For it is dead wrong about necessary surplus of winnings over losings.”

Trade, in other words, may not always work to the advantage of the American economy, according to Mr. Samuelson.

According to Mr. Samuelson, a low-wage nation that is rapidly improving its technology, like India or China, has the potential to change the terms of trade with America in fields like call-center services or computer programming in ways that reduce per-capita income in the United States. “The new labor-market-clearing real wage has been lowered by this version of dynamic fair free trade,” Mr. Samuelson writes.

But doesn’t purchasing cheaper call-center or programming services from abroad reduce input costs for various industries, delivering a net benefit to the economy? Not necessarily, Mr. Samuelson replied. To put things in simplified terms, he explained in the interview, “being able to purchase groceries 20 percent cheaper at Wal-Mart does not necessarily make up for the wage losses.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/09/business/worldbusiness/09outsource.html?pagewanted=1

Bad Behavior has blocked 717 access attempts in the last 7 days.

>>>>>>> .r246